*

Digital Storytelling / Story Circle / Reflection / Resources

Digital Storytelling

1950s family sitting in living room, watching tv screen. Screen shows camp fire burning.
gathering around the electronic hearth


For eons, humans have gathered around a fire, sharing stories.

Digital Storytelling is a method of telling personal stories using digital tools. These are typically stories of personal relevance — transcendence, transformation, change, of events or people in our lives who have made a difference.

Rather than the goal of commercial, corporate media to sell audiences to advertisers, the focus is on hearing the stories of everyday people, the communities in which we live, and the people with whom we share the planet. The belief is that there is empowerment in hearing the stories, as well as empowerment in the telling of the stories. Digital technologies are tools to aid in this ancient human practice of storytelling.

Primarily initiated by the multimedia performance work of Dan Atchley and developed by Joe Lambert, founder of the StoryCenter.org (formerly the Center for Digital Storytelling in Berkeley, California, USA), the Digital Storytelling technique has spread across the globe. Contexts have included support in healing and prevention of domestic violence, awareness of HIV, conflict resolution and reconciliation, and self-reflexivity in the college classroom.

Digital Storytelling focuses more on the stories told, and less on the technical polish of the finished production. Simple digital tools and methods are used, drawing from archival family photographs and artifacts, with the voice of the storyteller favored over that of the polished professional announcer.

Digital Storytelling utilizes John O’Neal’s Story Circle process to help cultivate a group bond and personal growth through reflection, respectful dialogue, listening, and shared storytelling.

Within scholarly circles, there are striking similarities between the tenets of digital storytelling and notions of self-reflexivity, oral history, ethnographic methods of social science, and media as tools for building community and affecting personal/social change.

With stories rooted in the experience of the storyteller searching for personal or universal human truths, Digital Storytelling offers a unique method of cultivating practical self-reflexivity for people in a variety of personal and cultural contexts.

top


Story Circle

group of people sitting in chairs in a circle.

A key element in the Digital Storytelling process is the “Story Circle,” drawing from the work started during the 1960s’ Civil Rights Movement by John O’Neal and Free Southern Theater, evolving into Junebug Productions.

From JunebugProductions.org:

The rules of the story circle are the rules of civil participation in society. You agree to listen. You agree to respect. John O’Neal

“Story Circle is central to Junebug’s art-making & engagement. Junebug uses the Story Circle methodology created by our founder John O’Neal to build bridges, facilitate brave spaces, share stories, and cultivate healing.”

In Digital Storytelling, the Story Circle process provides a respectful, safe, encouraging, nurturing place to share your thoughts, ideas, emotions – and hear others’. “Deep listening” is cultivated.

We help each other find and develop our stories, providing and getting feedback on the meaning behind moments of change in our lives.

We are changed as we help others find their stories and discover the meanings behind our own story. The group forms a bond as the stories emerge.

The culmination of the Digital Storytelling experience is the community gathering, where we share the stories created through the process with friends and family. For people in the story circle, it’s delightfully uplifting to see where the initial story idea ultimately led the storyteller in making meaning of an event in their life.

top


Guided Reflection


Paulo Freire was a Brazilian educator engaged in adult literacy whose seminal work, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, emerged in the late 1960s and early 1970s and has had a profound global impact on pedagogy (the process of learning and teaching). Freire is a significant source for notions of reflection and action to understand and change the social order; in particular, to improve the lives of marginalized people.

Freire described all education as political in nature, and criticized institutional schooling as oppressing students, training them to serve as objects (passive, acted upon, regurgitating information). He expanded the idea of schooling to include everyday life, and how we’re trained to respond by power groups in society.

Instead, Freire described a system where people would become subjects (actively taking charge of their life to transform the world), growing constantly through life-long learning.

To achieve this, he identified processes of dialogue (a focus on listening as well as speaking) and praxis (critical reflection and action upon the world in order to transform it).

Through praxis, a person would act, then reflect (using guided critical processes) on that action and its impact, then act again, this time informed by reflection. The ongoing process of learning and action repeat in an upward growth spiral to conscientization: a critical awareness (better understanding how power works in social and political arenas). Through praxis, we can better recognize and address injustice in our communities.

Philosopher Roland Barthes noted differences between reflection and reflexivity:

Reflexivity doesn’t mean simply to `reflect on’ (which usually comes either later or too late) but is an immediate critical consciousness of what one is doing, thinking or writing.

Paulo Freire and Social Transformation. Peace Review 9.4: 571-577. 1997.

Studying in Mexico, 1969
Course catalog, CIDOC
Cuernavaca Mexico, 1969
image of course catalog with focus on Paulo Freire as instructor for a literacy course
Paulo Freire listed as course instructor,
CIDOC, Cuernavaca Mexico, 1969

top


Resources

top